#Sugarconsumption

A new cane sugar version of Coca-Cola is now on shelves, replacing high-fructose corn syrup with cane sugar. Some wellness voices applaud the change, but experts say the health impact is modest and driven more by branding than a major nutritional upgrade. For Thai readers, the shift raises questions about sugar sources, total intake, and everyday choices.

A strong opening point: both cane sugar and HFCS supply calories but offer little in the way of essential nutrients. In Thailand, the health risk rises with overall sugar consumption, not the sugar type. Public health campaigns continue to urge moderation and reduced added sugar across all foods and drinks.

Coca-Cola’s latest announcement to introduce a new version of its classic soda, sweetened with cane sugar instead of high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), is making waves in the beverage world. While this move is being celebrated by some wellness influencers and health-conscious consumers, research and expert opinions reveal that the change is more of a marketing tactic than a substantive health initiative. The nutritional difference between cane sugar and HFCS, in reality, is minute—raising critical questions about the motives driving such product innovation and what it truly means for consumers, including those in Thailand.

A startling case recently surfaced online, detailing how an individual developed an astonishing 35 kidney stones after regular consumption of Coca-Cola, igniting widespread discussions about the potential health hazards of excessive soft drink intake. This rare and severe outcome has prompted Thai health professionals and the public alike to reconsider the safety of popular sugary drinks, and to explore the broader implications for kidney health in Thailand—a country where soda and sweetened beverage consumption remains high.

A recent online case from a neighboring region has drawn attention to potential kidney-health risks linked to regular Coca-Cola consumption. Thai health professionals note that while a report of 35 stones is extraordinary, it underscores concerns about high-sugar drinks and dehydration, still common in Thailand today.

The widely shared narrative describes an adult with a long history of daily cola intake who developed a large number of kidney stones. Researchers caution that this is an extreme example, not a typical outcome. Public health campaigns in Thailand emphasize reducing sugary beverage intake to protect kidney health and overall well-being.

A growing body of research highlights seven clear signs that you may be consuming too much sugar. In Thailand, daily sugar intake surpasses recommended levels, making recognition of these warning signs vital for public health and personal well-being.

Experts estimate the average Thai consumes about 23 teaspoons of sugar each day—far above the limits set by health authorities. By contrast, the American Heart Association recommends no more than 9 teaspoons for men and 6 for women daily. The main culprits are sweetened beverages, desserts, and many processed foods that hide added sugars even when not overtly sweet. According to nutrition professionals, cutting back on these items can significantly improve health outcomes over time.

As worries mount over rising health risks linked to excess sugar, new research and dietary guidelines have spotlighted seven key red flags that may signal overconsumption of sugar. With Thailand’s daily sugar intake averaging far above recommended levels, recognising these warning signs could be critical to tackling a growing public health threat.

Experts indicate that the average Thai consumes about 23 teaspoons of sugar daily—almost four times the maximum recommended by health authorities (Bangkok Post). This stands in stark contrast to the American Heart Association’s recommended limit—no more than 9 teaspoons (36 grams) per day for men and 6 teaspoons (25 grams) for women. The main culprits are often sweetened beverages, desserts, and even processed foods that don’t taste overtly sweet but are laced with added sugars.