#TeacherTraining

A recent review of North Carolina school districts found that a substantial number lack written policies on classroom use of artificial intelligence, raising fresh questions about preparedness, equity and academic integrity that resonate far beyond the United States. The review examined 26 districts and found 17 had formal policies guiding AI use in classrooms while eight districts reported no policy and one district did not respond, highlighting inconsistent district-level responses to a technology which educators say is already reshaping teaching and learning. At the same time, controlled trials from U.S. universities show measurable academic benefits when chatbots and AI tools are integrated thoughtfully, suggesting that absence of policy does not mean absence of potential. For Thai educators, policymakers and parents, the North Carolina snapshot offers a cautionary example: without coordinated guidance and teacher training, schools risk both missed opportunities and harms related to cheating, bias, and widened digital divides.

A new report reveals that half of high schools in New York’s Capital Region do not offer any computer science courses, sparking concern among educators, policymakers, and technology experts about whether students are being adequately prepared for an artificial intelligence-driven future. The findings, published by the Center for an Urban Future, highlight a pervasive gap in foundational technology education just as computational literacy becomes an increasingly essential skill for navigating tomorrow’s job market (Times Union).

In Bangkok’s gleaming technology districts and Thailand’s remote rural villages, a critical educational divide threatens the nation’s digital ambitions. Recent analysis of global education patterns reveals that vast numbers of schools worldwide—including half of all high schools in developed regions—fail to offer basic computer science instruction, leaving millions of students unprepared for an economy increasingly dominated by artificial intelligence and digital automation.

The Center for an Urban Future’s comprehensive report on New York State education exposes a troubling reality that mirrors challenges across Southeast Asia. Despite government rhetoric about digital transformation and Thailand 4.0 initiatives, foundational computational skills remain absent from most Thai classrooms. This educational gap threatens to create a generation of digital consumers rather than digital creators, potentially undermining Thailand’s ambitious plans to become a regional technology hub.

As artificial intelligence (AI) rapidly transforms daily life, a growing chorus of education experts is calling for AI literacy instruction to begin in early childhood, well before traditional school years. A recent article in The 74 Million highlights the urgent need to support the youngest learners—those even before kindergarten—with critical skills for an AI-driven world, warning that waiting until primary school may squander a vital developmental window (the74million.org).

This call to action comes as nearly 70 leading technology companies and associations in the United States recently pledged to support accessible AI education initiatives for all K-12 students under a government-backed initiative. However, early childhood advocates and researchers warn that the focus on formal schooling, starting in kindergarten, misses a crucial period of early brain development. During the early years—birth to five—children’s brains form connections at their fastest rate, cementing the foundational skills most crucial for lifelong learning and adaptation.

Recent global advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) are upending assumptions about the future of computer science education, challenging educators, policymakers, and technology leaders across Thailand to elevate training standards and focus on foundational skills over rote learning. Contrary to fears that AI tools might eliminate the need for coding or computer science training, research and initiatives unfolding in Thailand and beyond suggest that AI will instead prompt a systemic overhaul—raising the bar for quality instruction and empowering both teachers and students with potent new capabilities.

A surge in innovative educator-driven strategies is reshaping how computer science is taught in schools, as new research and classroom experiences reveal fresh methods to engage young learners and equip them for a digital future. A recent story from EdSurge highlights how a blend of professional learning and grassroots creativity is making computer science “click” not only for students, but for teachers with little or no prior technical background (EdSurge).

Recent headlines have ignited a lively debate among educators, psychologists, and parents about a long-repeated phrase: “good job.” Emerging research, prominent opinion columns like the recent Globe and Mail feature, and expert commentary are challenging the effectiveness—and even appropriateness—of generic praise in child development. As the school year draws to a close in Thailand, understanding the science behind praise has practical implications for teachers, parents, and policymakers seeking to nurture resilient, self-motivated youth.

Generative artificial intelligence, once viewed with suspicion and outright bans in schools, is now increasingly seen as a vital educational tool by K-12 teachers across the United States, according to the latest reporting and research. This evolution from nuisance to necessity signals a pivotal moment in education, with implications and potential lessons for Thailand as AI reshapes global classroom practices. (washingtontimes.com)

The discussion around AI in primary and secondary education has matured rapidly since 2022, when tools like ChatGPT first appeared on the academic scene. Initially, schools and teachers were quick to ban generative AI platforms due to fears of increased cheating, misinformation, and a perceived threat to traditional pedagogies. However, facing the realities of digital transformation, educators soon realized that AI technologies could be harnessed for positive learning outcomes—if they were strategically and ethically integrated into curricula.

A new meta-analysis by the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences offers the most detailed understanding to date of how our brains process written language—a development with profound implications for education, mental health, and addressing literacy challenges in Thailand and worldwide. Published in the journal Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, the study summarizes decades of neuroscience research, analyzing data from 163 brain imaging studies to construct a highly detailed map of the brain regions activated during different types of reading tasks, from letters and words to sentences and passages.

As artificial intelligence (AI) rapidly reshapes economies and societies worldwide, leading educators are warning that Thai students must urgently gain broader access to computer science education to thrive in the digital future. The international debate, exemplified by a recent analysis published in The Desert Sun, argues that understanding computer science is now as fundamental as reading, with AI’s pervasive influence touching nearly every industry and aspect of daily life (desertsun.com).

A major new study has brought to light an enduring problem both globally and in Thailand: despite the growing influence of neuroscience in education, persistent misconceptions—so-called “neuromyths”—continue to misinform the way teachers, especially those in early childhood education, understand and apply brain science in their classrooms. The research, published on April 22, 2025, surveyed over 520 early childhood educators in Australia, revealing that many still believe debunked ideas, such as the necessity of catering to “learning styles” or the notion that students are either “left-brained” or “right-brained” thinkers. Experts warn these myths are not just harmless misunderstandings, but may actively undermine effective teaching and learning—an issue with clear implications for Thai educators and policymakers ScienceAlert.