#TeachingWithAI

College professors in the United States are increasingly using generative AI like ChatGPT to design course materials, grade work, and give feedback. Students, however, worry that AI-generated content may reduce the human elements they expect from education. The debate gained attention after a notable case at Northeastern University, highlighting questions of ethics, transparency, and quality in AI-enhanced teaching.

Thai students and educators are likely familiar with these tensions as universities here explore AI tools. The core issue remains the same: can AI enhance learning without compromising the irreplaceable human guidance that sits at the heart of education? This is a global conversation with local resonance.

College professors across the United States are rapidly adopting generative artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT to prepare course materials, grade assignments, and even provide student feedback—a trend sparking frustration and debate among students, who question whether AI-generated content shortchanges the human value they expect from their education. The issue was brought into sharp public focus by recent student complaints at top-tier institutions, including a widely discussed case at Northeastern University, fueling a broader conversation about ethics, transparency, and educational quality in the era of AI-enhanced teaching.