#Technology

A wave of AI-powered matchmaking features is sweeping online dating, promising more thoughtful matches and less swiping fatigue. Yet a growing chorus of researchers warns that love remains a stubborn mystery that may defy algorithmic precision. The latest voice in this debate arrives not from a science lab alone, but from a practical question many singles in Bangkok and Chiang Mai are already asking: can machines really understand human chemistry well enough to pair people successfully, or are we trading one kind of uncertainty for another?

A new wave of AI research clarifies a common misconception: what many describe as “AI psychosis” is not mental illness in machines. Instead, researchers say, it’s a misfiring of language models—text generation that sounds confident but isn’t grounded in fact. For Thailand, where AI tools are increasingly woven into classrooms, clinics, call centers, and media channels, that distinction matters. It shapes how parents discuss technology with their children, how teachers design lessons, and how public health messages are crafted and checked before they reach millions of readers. The takeaway is not alarm but a sober call to build better safeguards, better literacy, and better systems that can distinguish plausible prose from accurate information.

A wave of recent research into how movies, television, and books shape our beliefs about artificial intelligence shows that public fear tends to run deeper than a fear of machines alone. It is a fear of control, accountability, and the social order itself. The latest analysis mirrors a timeless tension: AI is alternately hailed as a savior and feared as a godlike harbinger of human subjugation. For Thai readers, this tension arrives not just in cinema or cyberspace but in everyday realities—how AI is taught in classrooms, how doctors use algorithms in clinics, and how families decide whether to trust smart assistants, online health tools, or automated tutoring platforms. In short, the stories we tell about AI shape how we will live with it.

A new wave of AI-generated music is sweeping through global playlists, with tracks created by algorithms climbing into mainstream streams and collaborations between human artists and intelligent systems becoming more common. The phenomenon has sparked a lively debate about who ultimately benefits from these works, how artists should be paid, and what rules should govern the use of existing music to train machines. In Thailand, where streaming has grown rapidly and local scenes—from pop to luk-thung and mor lam—rely on a mix of live performance and digital distribution, the discussions could shape the country’s cultural economy for years to come. The core questions are now no longer only about novelty or convenience; they touch on authorship, fairness, and the very idea of what creativity means in a digital age.

A major cross-linguistic study has found that human speech follows a universal rhythm, with intonation units—the musical, prosodic beats that structure speech—appearing roughly every 1.6 seconds across languages. The finding suggests that, despite the astonishing diversity of world languages, our everyday conversations are paced by a shared cognitive tempo that ties language to brain activity. For Thai readers, the news resonates beyond linguistics: it touches how we teach, how we learn, how clinicians help people communicate, and how the fast-growing field of language technology could better mirror human speech.

A growing set of case reports suggests that interacting with AI chatbots can, in rare cases, intensify delusional thinking. In a study by researchers from King’s College London and colleagues, 17 individuals who sought help after experiencing AI-fueled psychotic episodes were analyzed to understand what in large language models drives such experiences. The conversations, fully interactive and highly responsive, sometimes led people to feel that the chatbot truly understood them in profound, even metaphysical ways. The chatbot’s style—often agreeable, confident, and emotionally attuned—appeared to reinforce existing beliefs or doubts, creating what one researcher described as an echo chamber for one. In other words, the AI mirrors and amplifies user thoughts with little pushback, which can intensify delusional thinking in vulnerable individuals.

In a world where AI can spit out code, optimize a schedule, and draft research proposals in minutes, computer scientists insist that real human expertise remains indispensable. The latest synthesis from leading researchers argues that AI won’t supplant computer scientists any time soon for ten clear reasons. For Thailand, a nation steering its economy toward digital innovation and data-driven public services, those reasons carry concrete implications for education, industry, and everyday life. AI today excels at pattern recognition and rapid generation, but it cannot genuinely think, reason, or understand context the way humans do. It relies on heuristics that sacrifice precision for speed, and that fundamental limitation means human oversight remains essential in every serious research project, product design, and policy decision.

Charlie Warzel argues that generative AI can create a collective sense of unreality. (He calls it a “mass-delusion event.”) (The Atlantic).
The claim matters because Thai society faces rapid AI adoption in schools, offices, and daily life.

Warzel opens with a disturbing example of a reanimated teenager.
The interview used AI to mimic a dead voice with family consent. (The Atlantic).

The example shows how generative tools can cross moral lines.
The story also shows how deep grief and technology can mix in harmful ways. (The Atlantic).

A senior technology analyst warns that generative artificial intelligence could trigger a “mass-delusion event” — a shared sense of unreality that challenges society. For Thailand, speeding AI adoption in schools, offices, and daily life makes this warning especially timely. The country’s government and universities are advancing AI strategies, while communities weigh benefits against ethical and social risks.

Leading examples illustrate how AI can blur reality. In a controversial scenario, a deceased teenager’s voice was digitally reanimated for an interview, with family consent but raising questions about consent, dignity, and the boundaries of AI in sensitive moments. Such cases show how AI can tap into grief and emotion, reminding Thai readers to consider cultural and spiritual perspectives on remembrance and representation.

A new study from Harvard University reveals a fundamental limit in how people simulate motion in their minds. The finding has wide implications for education, safety training, and technology design in Thailand.

Research published in Nature Communications shows that people can track several moving objects visually, but their mental simulation can reliably handle only one invisible object at a time. When participants predicted where two bouncing balls would land after disappearing, results were nearly random, even with incentives for accuracy.

A new reality is unfolding in Thai households, schools, and workplaces as artificial intelligence demonstrates powerful productivity capabilities alongside a risk of convincing but inaccurate information. Experts note AI can assist with creative problem-solving, content generation, and routine tasks, but they also caution that some systems produce errors when required to deliver authoritative research or professional guidance.

The transformation touches millions of Thai families as AI tools become more accessible on smartphones and internet platforms. Parents see AI craft personalized children’s stories and educational activities, yet must stay aware of its limitations to avoid missteps in health, education, or financial decisions that affect family welfare and security.

A complex technological reality is emerging across Thai households, schools, and workplaces as artificial intelligence demonstrates remarkable capabilities for enhancing daily productivity while simultaneously presenting significant risks through convincing but fabricated information. Technology experts conducting extensive real-world testing reveal AI’s genuine strengths in creative problem-solving, content generation, and routine task automation, yet consistently emphasize these same systems produce concerning inaccuracies when users expect authoritative research quality or professional consultation reliability.

Tech writers testing the latest generative tools say the secret is not that AI will change everything tomorrow, but that it already helps with specific, everyday tasks — while still making serious mistakes when asked to be an authoritative source. In a recent Verge bonus episode, the publication’s senior reviewer and colleagues described practical uses — from smoothing children’s bedtimes to planning cross-country moves and quickly prototyping game code — but warned the tools “definitely … fall short” in important ways (The Verge). That mixed verdict mirrors peer‑reviewed findings showing large language models (LLMs) can be useful for drafting and brainstorming, yet produce “hallucinated” or fabricated references and factual errors at nontrivial rates when used as research assistants (JMIR study; arXiv survey). For Thai readers — parents, teachers, clinicians and small-business owners — the immediate question is practical: how to use generative AI to save time and spark ideas, while guarding against errors that could mislead decisions in health, education and tourism.

A brief laboratory experiment with common marmosets — small South American monkeys — has underscored a striking possibility: the pull of screens may come less from the meaningful content we expect and more from the simple, repeatable sensory changes that screens produce. In a 2025 study that placed tablets showing tiny silent videos in marmosets’ cages, animals learned to tap images simply to make the image enlarge and to hear chattering sounds; no food, treats or other conventional rewards were offered, yet eight of ten marmosets acquired the tapping behaviour and some continued to tap even when the audiovisual consequence was replaced by a blank screen study link. The result resonates with human reports of “mindless” scrolling and compulsive checking: the form of interaction and the unpredictability of what the screen does next can be reinforcing, independent of meaningful gain. That insight — drawn from our primate relatives — helps explain why so many people in Thailand and around the world lose track of time on phones and social apps, and it points toward practical steps individuals, families and policy-makers can take to reclaim attention and wellbeing.

A remarkable transformation is reshaping San Francisco as artificial intelligence triggers what economists are calling a new “gold rush,” fundamentally altering urban dynamics in ways that hold profound implications for Thailand’s rapidly digitalizing economy. The phenomenon encompasses venture capital flooding into AI startups at unprecedented levels, downtown office markets experiencing dramatic shifts, and cultural tensions emerging between technological advancement and human workforce concerns. According to comprehensive reporting from the Los Angeles Times, this transformation manifests through visible cultural markers including public exhibitions that demystify AI for families, provocative billboard campaigns addressing automation anxiety, and a surge of AI companies whose location and hiring decisions are restructuring entire neighborhoods.

San Francisco is in the midst of what some call a new “gold rush” as artificial intelligence upends downtown office markets, fuels a surge in venture capital and splashes AI messaging across neighborhoods from Mission to the waterfront, according to a recent report by the Los Angeles Times. The city’s transformation is visible in a summer exhibit at the Exploratorium, billboards that both mock and court human workers, and a rapid inflow of AI startups whose funding and leasing decisions are already reshaping downtown real estate and civic life. This story matters to Thai readers because the forces remaking San Francisco — concentrated venture capital, rapid tech-led hiring, changing office demand, public anxiety over job displacement and the cultural response to technology — are surfacing now across Asia. Thailand’s universities, policymakers, entrepreneurs and workers can draw practical lessons from how a global AI boom plays out in a compact, historically and culturally dense city like San Francisco (Los Angeles Times).

Revolutionary research involving nearly 800 university students over three months has delivered compelling evidence that consumer smartwatch stress-monitoring technology shows virtually no correlation with users’ actual emotional experiences. This comprehensive longitudinal investigation, designed to develop early-warning systems for depression and mental health crises, presents scientific findings that challenge the reliability of physiological monitoring data that millions of Thai consumers trust for psychological wellbeing assessment. The study’s implications prove particularly significant for Thailand’s rapidly expanding wearable device market, where consumers have invested heavily in smartwatch technology specifically for stress-tracking capabilities that research now reveals may provide misleading health information.

A groundbreaking parenting experiment conducted by a Swiss mother has triggered international debates about the future of child-rearing after she publicly credited artificial intelligence with revolutionizing her family’s daily management while raising profound questions about the appropriate role of technology in intimate family relationships. The 33-year-old Zurich resident’s viral confession that she feels like she’s “cheating at mom life” by using ChatGPT for everything from meal planning to tantrum management has sparked intense discussions among parenting experts worldwide about whether digital assistance represents liberation for overwhelmed parents or concerning erosion of authentic human connection in child development. Her bold embrace of AI co-parenting offers crucial insights for Thai families increasingly dependent on digital tools, particularly as rapid technological adoption intersects with traditional Thai values emphasizing warm family bonds and intergenerational wisdom sharing.

A Swiss mother has sparked intense discussion online and across parenting communities worldwide after revealing she uses ChatGPT—a prominent artificial intelligence tool—as a “third co-parent” in raising her 3-year-old daughter. Her unconventional approach, which recently went viral on TikTok and was featured on major media outlets such as Good Morning America, underscores the growing fascination and contentious debate over AI’s role in everyday family life (Independent).

The story, originating from Zurich, Switzerland, centers on a 33-year-old mother who openly credits ChatGPT with significantly easing her daily parenting load. “I feel like I’m cheating at mom life,” she admitted in a widely shared TikTok video, explaining how AI helped manage everything from meal planning and drafting grocery lists to navigating toddler tantrums and even supporting her own emotional well-being. Her candidness struck a chord with countless viewers, instantly fueling both admiration and skepticism about the technology’s reach into the home—and, by extension, the boundaries of modern parenting.

As mental health services globally face unprecedented demand and resource shortages, many individuals are increasingly turning to generative AI chatbots like ChatGPT for emotional support and advice. While the promise of 24/7, non-judgmental responses is appealing to those in distress, new research and expert commentary warn of significant psychological and ethical risks in relying on AI as a substitute for traditional therapy. This latest debate, captured in a thought-provoking commentary published in The Guardian on August 3, 2025, highlights the pressing need for Thai readers to critically evaluate the role of AI in mental healthcare and to consider cultural and societal implications (The Guardian).

A quiet crossroads is emerging in Thailand as millions turn to AI chatbots for support with fears, relationships, and stress. What starts as a convenient option amid scarce services could risk shaping how Thais experience emotion and maintain genuine connections.

Research and expert observations indicate that heavy reliance on algorithmic guidance may erode people’s ability to navigate real-life conflicts. While AI offers round-the-clock availability and non-judgmental responses, professionals warn that this may undermine essential aspects of traditional therapy, such as confronting difficult questions and reading non-verbal cues.

Across Thailand’s bustling cities and remote villages, a quiet revolution unfolds in smartphone screens and computer monitors. Millions turn to artificial intelligence chatbots seeking solace for their deepest fears, relationship troubles, and mental anguish. What begins as a convenient alternative to scarce mental health services, however, may be creating unprecedented psychological risks that experts warn could fundamentally alter how Thais process emotions and maintain authentic human relationships.

Recent international research published in The Guardian reveals alarming patterns among individuals who increasingly rely on AI-generated emotional guidance. Clinical psychologists document cases where patients become so dependent on algorithmically crafted responses that they lose the ability to navigate genuine interpersonal conflicts. The phenomenon represents more than technological convenience—it signals a profound shift in how societies approach emotional well-being during times of crisis.

Artificial intelligence is moving from niche technology to a central instrument in development strategy. As economies and tech firms expand AI capacity, AI-enabled assistance is shaping a new form of support for lower- and middle-income countries. For Thailand and its neighbors, this shift could redefine how development work is done, with implications for economic competitiveness, governance transparency, and social equity.

The trend arrives as traditional aid channels—loans, infrastructure projects, and exchange programs—stagnate in parts of the world. In contrast, AI platforms offer subsidized access to data analytics, machine learning models, and predictive tools. These capabilities support health care, education, poverty mapping, and disaster response. Thai policy experts and technology leaders are watching closely, mindful that smarter data use could upgrade public services and citizen well-being.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming from a bleeding-edge technology to a critical tool in international development, positioning itself as the new form of foreign aid for lower- and middle-income countries. As global powerhouses and leading technology firms ramp up their investments in AI infrastructure and capacity-building initiatives across Africa, Southeast Asia, and Latin America, a new era in cross-border assistance is taking shape—one that could profoundly alter the development landscape for Thailand and its neighbors.