#Teenagers

A leading neuroscientist is reigniting debate over the voting age by arguing that 16-year-olds possess the cognitive skills needed to cast ballots responsibly, citing both neurological development and international examples as evidence. The discussion, sparked by a recent article in The Times, is gaining traction in countries considering electoral reform—including those, like Thailand, where youth political engagement has surged in recent years.

At a time when several democracies are weighing whether to lower their voting ages, neuroscientific research offers powerful new insights. According to the neuroscientist interviewed by The Times, teenagers aged 16 can reason, reflect, and make considered decisions—skills grounded in “cold cognition,” or logical thinking in calm settings. These cognitive abilities, the expert explains, develop enough by mid-adolescence to underpin mature choices at the ballot box.

Groundbreaking neuroscience research has ignited international debates about democratic participation by demonstrating that 16-year-olds possess the cognitive sophistication necessary for responsible electoral decision-making, challenging traditional assumptions about adolescent political competence that could transform Thailand’s approach to youth civic engagement. Leading brain scientists present compelling evidence that teenagers develop crucial “cold cognition” abilities—logical reasoning under calm conditions—that enable thoughtful ballot choices, while Thailand’s recent surge in youth political activism provides real-world validation of adolescent civic sophistication that demands serious reconsideration of voting age restrictions.

Across the world and in Thailand, the adolescent years can often feel like a season of distance between parents and their teens, as young people gravitate toward independence and peer circles. Yet, a recently viral parenting story has captured thousands of hearts online—and offers important food for thought for families everywhere. Stemming from a simple, daily challenge shared by a mother on TikTok, the experience of intentionally spending time with her teenage sons each day is sparking fresh conversations about the power of shared routines in nurturing family bonds during turbulent teen years.

For many Thai parents, the idea of watching a steamy scene in a film alongside their teenage child seems awkward, if not unthinkable. A recent article in The Times has sparked debate by challenging this discomfort, presenting accounts of parents intentionally exposing adolescents to stories with sexual themes as a springboard for open conversations. But what does the latest international research say about sharing sexual content as a family – and what are the implications for Thai families seeking to guide youth through modern media?

A new survey from Pew Research Center sheds fresh light on the evolving relationship between teenagers, social media, and mental health—revealing a complex mix of concern, ambivalence, and growing skepticism among youth and their parents. As Thai families navigate similar digital landscapes and mental health challenges, understanding these new findings can provide important context, guidance, and food for thought.

The recent Pew study, conducted between September and October 2024, surveyed 1,391 teenagers aged 13-17 and their parents in the United States. It found that concerns about youth mental health continue to rise, with both parents and teens increasingly linking these worries to the pervasive presence of social media platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook. The findings are particularly relevant for Thailand, where internet and social media penetration among teens is among the highest in Southeast Asia, and public debate has intensified over the psychological well-being of digital natives (see: Pew Research Center).

A recently translated ancient Babylonian letter penned by a teenage boy to his mother has captivated scholars and readers alike, providing fresh insight into the timelessness of adolescent-parent relationships. The clay tablet, believed to be nearly 3,800 years old, reveals familiar patterns of family dynamics, frustration, and communication issues—reminding us that the universal challenges of growing up and parenting span all of human history.

The discovery and subsequent translation of this letter, which has been widely circulated in both academic and mainstream media, underscores the enduring nature of teenage angst. The letter, originally unearthed decades ago in Iraq but only recently decoded in detail, is written in cuneiform and addressed from a boy named Iddin-Sin to his mother, Zinu. According to leading Assyriologists, the content is surprisingly relatable to modern families: the teenager expresses his disappointment for not receiving new clothes and accuses his mother of neglect, voicing his grievances in a tone that would not feel out of place in today’s digital messages between children and parents. The full translation and context for Iddin-Sin’s letter were recently publicized by scholars at the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, sparking viral discussions online (Smithsonian Magazine, Live Science).

A groundbreaking eight-year study from Finland has revealed that early childhood screen time is significantly linked to increased levels of stress and depressive symptoms among teenagers. Published in JAMA Network Open, this research is crucial for parents in Thailand and across the globe as it underscores the importance of managing digital device usage during critical developmental years source.

The study follows the Physical Activity and Nutrition in Children (PANIC) cohort, involving 187 children tracked from ages 6 to 9 up to their teenage years. It highlights that children who logged more hours on phones and tablets tended to face more severe mental health challenges in adolescence. With mental health issues in teens becoming more prevalent, particularly with symptoms typically emerging during these years, the findings are a wake-up call for those raising the future generation.